The Paddock That Grew Nothing

On why “save our farmland” is the wrong fight for the right reason.

Wollongong Railway Station, 1900. 

Take a good look at that old photo of the railway station. Timber and tin, a scatter of weatherboard cottages, and open paddock rolling away in every direction. Now go and stand where the photographer stood. There isn’t a vacant block for miles. Every one of those paddocks filled in, one approval at a time, and nobody felt the loss on the day it happened. That’s how it always goes. The green doesn’t vanish in a single bad decision. It goes in slices, each one too small to argue about, until one day you look up and the hills have a rash.

The same station, 1920. Twenty years on

And it didn’t stop in 1920. Local residents Lesley East and Annette Young and their now husbands still remember driving into Wollongong in the early 1960s to see Psycho at the Regent Theatre on Keira Street, then a grand Art Deco picture palace only a few years old. They parked in a paddock right near the cinema. A paddock, in the middle of town. Today Wollongong is a city of more than 200,000 people, the Regent has been a church since 2005, Crown Street is a pedestrian mall, and the idea of an open field to leave your car in near the main street sounds like a tall tale. But that’s the whole point. Every one of those paddocks was “just one block” once.

Nobody stood in it the day it was lost.

So I have a lot of sympathy for the worry behind Graham Pike’s comment on one of my Catch-Up posts. He was referring to a development application on Minnamurra Lane, Jamberoo, a house and a farm shed on a vacant block, the one Cr Lawton sensibly sent off for a second look and independent legal advice at the May Council meeting. Here’s part of what he said:

“We might not be using the vacant lands or the land in question for food production right now. but most of these lands have been used for farming within the past century or less and, most importantly, we’ll need them for food production again as the human population, even in our area, increases uncontrollably and unsustainably and the resulting suburbanisation sprawls across and fragments this same agricultural/food producing land. The zoning of the land as RU1 or RU2 is a human construct and immaterial. It is still land that we have used and will in future need to use, if any is left uncovered by concrete and asphalt, for food production.” Graham Pike, Jamberoo

I’ve turned that over for days, because there’s a lot in it I agree with. The slow creep of houses and sheds across those hills is real. I’ve watched it happen. And his bigger worry, that we keep paving over the very ground we’ll need to feed ourselves one day, is a serious one.

In a later note, Graham went further and put his finger on what he sees as the root of it all: too many people. Human overpopulation, driving an economy that chews through the natural world. It’s a heartfelt view and plenty of thoughtful people share it.

That’s too big for me to sort out. What I’d say is simpler: whatever any of us thinks about how many people there ought to be, they’re already here. They were born, they need a roof, and saying “there are too many of them” doesn’t put one over a single head. So my mind goes to the thing we can actually do something about, which isn’t the number of people, but where they’re going to live.

The thing is, all that green didn’t go in one big decision anyone could point to. It went in slices, a block here, a shed there, each one too small to worry over on the day. Nobody ever stood up and voted to lose it. It just happened while we weren’t looking.

So maybe the better thing isn’t to fight every single house, but to decide on purpose where the houses should go, instead of letting them turn up one at a time until the hills are full again and we’re left wondering how.

And there’s a part of these “save our farmland” conversations that almost never gets said out loud. Farming is a business. For most farmers, the land isn’t only where they work. It’s the biggest thing they own, the nest egg meant to see them through old age after a lifetime of hard years and thin margins.

So when we say a paddock must stay green forever, I think we should stop and hear what we’re really asking. We’re asking that farmer, and only that farmer, to lock away the worth of their own land so the rest of us can enjoy the view on the drive past. A person in town can sell their house for whatever it’ll fetch. The farmer gets told their paddock is a community treasure and they ought to keep it green for a fraction of what it’s worth. I’m not sure that’s protecting farming. It feels more like asking one family to foot the bill for everyone else’s nice outlook.

I’ve stood on that side of the fence. I dairy farmed for decades, and I know what it is to look at a paddock and see both a lifetime’s work and the only retirement you’ve got. So I find myself asking the question that doesn’t get asked much: is that fair?

And it’s a slippery word, fair. Everyone in this thinks they’re on its side. The people in town feel it’s only fair the hills stay green, they get the view and lose nothing. The farmer feels it’s only fair they get to realise the worth of the land they’ve worked their whole life, the same as anyone else can with what they own. Both are sincere. Both are “fair.” They just can’t both have their way.

And it tends to be the farmer’s fairness that gets left out, because the farmer’s usually not in the room when the rest of us decide their paddock is too precious to touch.

So where does that leave me? Not where you might think. I’m not saying build everywhere. And I’m not saying the green hills don’t count, they’re a good part of why people love this place, and why the visitors come. The slow spread of sheds and houses across those ridgelines is real, and worth watching very closely.

But if we want our farmers to keep the hills green for the rest of us, the least we can do is be honest that we’re asking them to give something up, and decent enough to talk about who carries that cost rather than pretending it’s free.

Lock the gate on a farmer’s land and we haven’t saved farming. We’ve decided their retirement is a fair price for our view.

Good on Cr Lawton for asking for a proper look before anyone signs anything. That’s the kind of careful, eyes-open thinking this deserves, on this block and the next one. The conversation I’d like us to have isn’t “green or houses.” It’s “if we want the green, who pays for it, and is that fair on them?”

I don’t have a tidy answer. I’m not sure there is one. But I think we owe the farmers at least the courtesy of asking.

A note on the photos: I came across these two images on Facebook, where they were dated 1900 and 1920 and identified as Wollongong Railway Station. I haven’t been able to independently verify the dates or the photographer, so if anyone can confirm the details or knows the original source, I’d love to hear from you, please get in touch.

Daily News Round Up – 24 May 2026

Very local, state, national and the wider world, in everyday language, for people who haven’t got all day.

From a band called Fukers raising the roof for our firies, to an eighty-something bloke who built an ocean-going boat in his backyard, to a war that’s still keeping petrol dear, here’s the local-to-global wrap for 24 May 2026.

Betty from Blacktown and her brother Kevin from Kiama, making sense of the world’s chaos the only sensible way: over toast, a strong cuppa, and a good long natter on the phone. That’s what this Catch Up is for.

Very Local: a joyous night in the village, and a boat sixteen years in the making

Two cracking local stories this time, and both of them good news for a change.

The Fukers had Jamberoo dancing. The fundraiser in the village was a roaring success, raising money for the Jamberoo Rural Fire Brigade and the Red Cross. By all accounts it was a beauty. One person who was there summed it up far better than I could:

“Fukers didn’t disappoint, in fact they were wonderful. Congratulations organisers and Fukers for a joyous, uplifting evening that included audience participation via singing, dancing and the good news from vocalist Paul Taylor that the band will return next year to again help raise funds for the Rural Fire Brigade and Red Cross. Thank you Fukers for an absolutely fabulous evening in the village.”

Best of all, Paul Taylor has promised the band will be back next year to do it all over again. Good on the organisers, good on the band, and good on everyone who put their hand in their pocket for our firies.

The building is the thing. On the side of Saddleback Mountain, a Jamberoo fella named Michael set himself a job that would make most of us put the kettle on and have a lie down instead. In his own backyard, by hand, he built an ocean-going catamaran. An eighteen-and-a-half-metre boat that he designed himself. It took him sixteen years, with his wonderful wife Susie beside him the whole way.

Everyone who knew that narrow little road kept asking the same question: how on earth are you going to get it down off the mountain? There was even talk the ABC might film the whole thing and lift the boat out by helicopter. In the end no chopper was needed. The boat was cut into pieces and crawled down the road bit by bit over the best part of a week. And now she’s finally floating on the water, named Archimedes. A lovely reminder that it’s never too late to chase a big dream, and that sometimes the building of the thing matters just as much as where it ends up. You can read Lynne’s full story here.

Across the Country (Federal)

A surprise change out of the United States is worth a mention, because it touches plenty of Australian families with loved ones over there. The Trump government has announced that foreigners already living in the US who want a green card will now have to leave the country and apply from their home country instead. It’s a big shift from how things have worked for years, and it’s caught a lot of people on the hop.

Around the World (International)

Trouble at home for first responders abroad. A sad reminder this week of how dangerous the job can be. In New York, one person died and 36 others were hurt in a blast at a shipyard, and most of the injured were firefighters and other first responders rushing in to help. And over in Southern California, around 40,000 people were told to leave their homes and schools were shut after a storage tank kept leaking a hazardous chemical. A timely reminder of what emergency crews everywhere put on the line, which makes a night like our Fukers fundraiser for the Rural Fire Brigade feel all the more worthwhile.

The bottom line

It all joins up, Betty. A war on the far side of the world squeezes household budgets, the same squeeze that’s shaking up politics everywhere. But closer to home, the news is brighter. A village packed a hall to look after its firies, and a man on a mountain proved you’re never too old to do something improbable and wonderful. Not a bad lot to talk over with Kevin and a cuppa.

Sources: Clover Hill Diaries, NPR, Euronews, CNBC, Sydney Morning Herald, and others.

A note on Betty and Kevin: Betty grew up in Kiama before life took her to Blacktown. Her brother Kevin still lives in their old home town. Keeping up with what’s happening down the coast is partly nostalgia for the place she came from, but mostly it’s how she and Kevin fill those long phone calls she looks forward to all week. That’s what this Catch Up is really for. Not just the news, but the conversations it keeps alive.

The Building Is the Thing

Sixteen years, one very narrow road, and several quietly skeptical dinner parties later: Michael aboard Archimedes.

There’s a question that creeps up on people somewhere in their sixties and seventies. It arrives quietly and starts sitting in the room. What do you want this stretch of life to be for? Some people decide the answer is rest. Some chase the places they never got to. Some pour themselves into grandchildren, or a garden, or finally restoring the car that’s been under a tarp for twenty years. And a stubborn, wonderful few decide that what they want is to build something enormous and improbable with their own two hands, just to prove it can be done.

Michael is one of those few.

On the side of Saddleback Mountain, at Jamberoo, he set out to build an ocean-going catamaran. A self-designed, eighteen-and-a-half-metre boat, built in his own backyard. He’d talk about it with this great, infectious enthusiasm: the big idea, the plan, the vision of it finished and on the water. And beside him, as she always is, his gorgeous wife Susie would sit and smile. What a woman she is.

He’d bring it up at dinner parties, the way other people mention a renovation or a recent trip, and around the table you’d see the same look settle on every face. We were all thinking something. We were each, I suspect, thinking something completely different. Somewhere in that circle was jealousy, and amazement, and flat incredulity, quietly calculating the boat’s chances against a road that accommodates cows and precisely one car at a time. We’d nod warmly and pass the wine. Then we’d go home to our perfectly normal backyards, containing no catamaran whatsoever.

How on earth are you ever going to get it out of here?

When he started, I doubt Michael imagined it would take sixteen years. The big idea rarely comes with the small print attached. Somewhere along the way there was even talk that the ABC might make a documentary of it, that the grand finale would see the boat lifted out by helicopter, surely the only sensible way to get a thing that size off a mountain. Anyone who knew the narrow road he lived on was asking the same question we all were: how on earth are you ever going to get it out of here?

Photo credit 

The helicopter stayed on the ground and the documentary went unmade. What happened instead was better: the boat was cut into pieces and crawled down a narrow road, metre by metre, over the better part of a week. The polished launch footage you can find online skips all of that and shows the dream going into the water, clean and triumphant, with the difficult and stubborn and real parts left on the cutting-room floor. Watching it, knowing what it actually took, I find myself quietly amused. That’s a long way from how it looked coming down the hill.

The building is the thing. Some people garden. Some people restore cars. Michael and Susie built an ocean-going boat by hand, for sixteen years.

Where they take it, and whether they take it anywhere at all, almost feels secondary to having proved it could be done.

The launch video carries a line as its title: to strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. It’s the closing line of Tennyson’s Ulysses, a poem about old age and the refusal to stop. Whoever chose it understood exactly what this was: a way of answering that quiet question that arrives in your sixties and never quite leaves.

What do you want to do with the years you’ve got left?

Michael and Susie answered it on the side of a mountain, one piece of fibreglass at a time. And the boat is finally on the water.

Want to hear more from Michael and learn what does it take to pull off an incredible Project like ” Archimedes” ?

 

A Little Shout-Out to Kiama Library

Something caught my eye on Facebook the other day and it put a smile on my dial.

Whoever runs the socials at our local Kiama Library is very clever, and they deserve a shout-out.

The first one was a brilliant bit of bookface, the art of holding a book cover up so it lines up with a real person behind it, and the cover seems to finish the picture. It turns out this has a name and a bit of history. It grew out of an older idea called “sleeveface” from 2007, where people posed with vinyl record covers. The book version really took off when the New York Public Library started sharing theirs in 2015, and France’s famous Librairie Mollat bookshop turned it into a global craze a couple of years later. These days libraries everywhere join in, usually tagged #BookFaceFriday.

But Kiama hasn’t just copied the trend. They’ve put their own cheeky stamp on it. Here are a few that made me grin:

They’ve also got a running gag about AI coming for library jobs, which had me laughing too

What I love is that it’s not just clever photography. It’s a warm, funny way to show off the books on their shelves and remind us what a gem we have on our doorstep. So this is just a small thank you to the team at Kiama Library. You’ve brightened up my feed and reminded me to pop in and borrow something. How clever are they?

Why GDP Gets So Much Attention

 

Same money, two doors. Most of it went to the houses.

Last time we cracked open GDP and found the weird bit: your house can double in value without the country making one extra thing. We worked out why. You buy a house that’s already there, you’re richer, but nothing new got built. That’s just savings in a nicer jacket. Money goes into a business instead and it buys gear, takes people on, makes stuff. That’s productivity, and that’s the thing that lifts everyone, not just the bloke who spent the money.

So your house doesn’t count. Fine. But here’s the bit you’d be right to ask about: so what? Why does that matter for the whole country, not just for you?

Because the country’s only got so much money to put to work. And where it goes decides what kind of country you end up living in.

Picture all the nation’s savings as one big pool. Every year money flows in, and it has to go somewhere. It can go into businesses that make things and hire people. Or roads and trains. Or it can go into buying houses that are already standing and bidding the price up. Same pool, different doors. And for years now we’ve shoved a massive chunk of it through the housing door.

Money through the productive door, the country can make more next year than it did this year. More stuff, more services, more done per hour. That’s the pie getting bigger. Money through the housing door, the pie doesn’t grow. The same house just changes hands for more. You feel richer because the number on the place went up. But the country can’t actually do or make a single thing more than it could before.

Do that for thirty years and you get exactly what we’ve got. A country that looks loaded on paper and can’t work out why it feels stuck. The money’s real. It’s just locked up in land that makes nothing. And the things that would grow the pie, the businesses, the new industries, got starved of the money that went into property instead. That’s the bit people miss. The boom in one is the drought in the other. Same pool.

Here’s what that looks like on a normal Thursday. The jobs figures came out this week and they were grim. Unemployment up to 4.5%, worst since late 2021. Thirty-three thousand more people out of work, nearly 19,000 jobs gone in the month. Hit young people hardest, youth unemployment’s over 11% now, and this month the losses fell mostly on women. That’s work getting harder to find, which worries a household long before it worries anyone in Canberra. And on the very same day, the share market had one of its best days in weeks. Two numbers, one morning, pointing opposite ways. What’s good for the big end of town and what’s good for your kitchen table just aren’t always the same story.

That gap right there is the whole thing in small. A country can post lovely-looking numbers while the ground under ordinary households gets wobblier, because the wealth and the work have come unstuck from each other. And part of why they came unstuck is where the money went. Money sitting in land that just gets dearer isn’t money building the businesses that’d hire those 33,000.

You see it everywhere once you’ve spotted it. Wages that don’t climb like they used to, because there’s no productivity growth underneath pushing them up. A tax system that rewards buying the thing that makes nothing and punishes building the thing that does, so even more money goes through the wrong door. Smart people and big money chasing the next property deal instead of the next business, because that’s where the easy money’s been. None of these are separate problems. It’s the one problem wearing different hats.

Lets not make it too neat. Housing isn’t all dead weight. Building new homes is good, very good. It employs a lot of people, and having a roof over your head is worth something no GDP number ever captures. And plenty of countries with dear housing still get along fine. One bad month of jobs figures doesn’t prove any of this on its own either, the economy has its own ups and downs that have nothing to do with houses.

So it’s not that houses are the baddie, and it’s not that one bad month of jobs figures proves the whole thing on its own. It’s that when a whole country leans this hard on the one thing that doesn’t grow the pie, year after year, the pie stops growing. And when the pie stops growing, you’ve got less to go round for everything else.

That’s why it’s a big deal. The GDP in not some magic number on the telly. The GDP is the scoreboard for one choice the country keeps making without quite meaning to: do we build the thing, or just sell each other the thing we already built for more. We’ve spent a long time doing the second. And the bill for that isn’t a number. It’s a country that could’ve been doing more, and isn’t.

Your house doesn’t count. Turns out that’s not some quirk of the accounting. It’s the whole story in one line.

Daily News Round Up – 23 May 2026

Very local, state, national and the wider world, in everyday language, for people who haven’t got all day.

From a Council meeting that could decide who runs Kiama, to a budget fight reshaping Canberra and the Iran war still at the petrol pump, here’s the local-to-global wrap for 23 May 2026.

Betty from Blacktown and her brother Kevin from Kiama, making sense of the world’s chaos the only sensible way: over toast, a strong cuppa, and a good long natter on the phone. That’s what this Catch Up is for.

Very Local: a special Council meeting you’ll want to know about

Council has called an Extraordinary Meeting for 5pm this Wednesday 27 May, and there’s only one item on the list. That alone tells you it’s BIG. It’s Council’s formal response to the Minister’s proposed changes to the Performance Improvement Order, the “lift your game” notice that’s been hanging over Kiama. Here are the bits that caught my attention.

The big stick is now named out loud. The order spells out what happens if Council doesn’t lift. First a Financial Controller could be parachuted in to take the wheel on the money. And if that’s not enough, the Minister can suspend the Council entirely and install an administrator. In plain terms, our elected councillors could be sent home and an appointee put in charge. That’s the shadow behind every budget decision being made right now.

The good news, said out loud by the Minister. It’s not all stick. The Minister has handed Council an extra year to balance the books, now out to 2027-28, and openly acknowledged Council has made real progress. Better still, he’s pushed back on Council’s own deeper cuts, saying he’s worried about what slashing services would do to the community. So the bloke holding the order is actually arguing for gentler cuts, not harder ones. Worth remembering next time someone says Sydney is out to gut us.

Your bins are safe. The order flatly bans Council from outsourcing domestic waste services. The Minister reckons the small saving wouldn’t be worth the long-term loss to the community. Council half-agrees but is quibbling over the wording, asking that “waste management” be narrowed to “waste collection,” because it doesn’t run its own tip and needs to keep using outside contractors to cart rubbish away.

Jobs versus services, the $7 million question. This is the guts of it. Council has to close a $7 million gap between what it earns and what it spends. The order says do the gentler stuff first, the efficiency savings, before reaching for the big staff cuts. Here’s the eye-opener from Council’s own response. There were two options on the table. The bigger-saving option, $2.7 million, would mean axing community services, winding back tourism, and cutting library and Leisure Centre hours. The other saves less, $1.8 million, but hits staff numbers harder. Council is effectively saying it would rather restructure its own back office than gut the services residents actually use. That’s the choice to watch.

The accounting fight that sounds dull but isn’t. Council has lobbed back a sharp point. It says the Office of Local Government measures its performance in a way that even the NSW Auditor-General disagrees with. Council reckons that if you measured every council in the state the Auditor-General’s way, around 90 of them, roughly seven in ten across NSW, would be running at a loss. The unspoken message: don’t single Kiama out as uniquely hopeless when most of the state is in the same boat.

And yes, the parks again. Remember our holiday parks question? It’s here in black and white. The order tells Council to review its “strategic assets and revenue opportunities,” and Blue Haven Terralong gets its own special mention, with Council ordered to prepare a business case on whether to keep it, lease it, partner it out, or sell it, partly because of unresolved fire safety problems. So the asset shake-up isn’t a rumour. It’s a written instruction from the Minister.

The bottom line: this one meeting is the whole story in miniature. A small council under real pressure, an extra year of breathing room, a Minister who actually wants the cuts softened, and a quiet but crucial choice brewing between trimming the back office and trimming the services we use. It’s livestreamed on the Council website if you want to watch.

Across NSW (State)

A grim run on the roads this week, worth a mention if only because it’s the sort of thing that makes you drive a bit more carefully. Three people died in a two-car crash at Sans Souci in Sydney’s south early this morning, and there’ve been separate fatal crashes out near Warialda and Mudgee in the past few days. A sobering stretch.

On the brighter side, Vivid Sydney is now in full swing, lighting up the city every night until 13 June. If you or the family fancy a night out, the light walk and the drone shows are free, which counts for a lot just now. Rug up. It’s proper winter.

Across the Country (Federal)

The politics is getting willing. The big national story is the scrap over Jim Chalmers’ budget and its tax changes, and it’s reshaping the whole landscape. One Nation has surged in the first poll since the budget, and the Coalition, now split after the Nationals walked out earlier in the year, is promising to hand money back to workers by tying tax rates to inflation. The Opposition under Angus Taylor is also floating cutting welfare for non-citizens, which has stirred plenty of anger. The short version for the kitchen table: tax and cost of living are the whole ballgame now, and the minor parties are the ones cashing in.

The same money squeeze, everywhere. Notice the thread. The fight in Canberra over budgets and tax is the exact same fight playing out at our Council, just with more zeros. Everyone from the Treasurer to our Mayor is wrestling the same problem: not enough coming in, too much going out.

Around the World (International)

The Iran war grinds on, and it’s still about your petrol. The ceasefire in the US and Israel’s war with Iran is holding, just, but more than 400 people have been killed since it came into effect in mid-April. The latest twist: Iran’s Supreme Leader has reportedly ordered that the country’s enriched uranium not be sent abroad, which is the sort of thing that keeps everyone nervous. The Strait of Hormuz disruption is still rippling through global fuel prices, which is why petrol stays dear here at home.

Russia and China cosy up further. Vladimir Putin has been in Beijing meeting Xi Jinping, the two of them talking up closer ties, just a day after Donald Trump left the same city. Meanwhile the war in Ukraine drags on, with reports Russia’s economy is starting to wobble under the strain.

The bottom line

It all joins up, Betty. A war on the other side of the planet keeps petrol dear, which feeds the cost-of-living squeeze that’s shaking up politics in Canberra, which is the very same money fight our little Council is having on Wednesday night, just closer to home and with our library hours and bins on the line. Everyone’s wrestling the same beast. Not a bad lot to talk over with Kevin and a cuppa.

Sources: Kiama Municipal Council agenda, NSW Police, SBS, Yahoo News Australia, Al Jazeera, Sydney Morning Herald, and others.

A note on Betty and Kevin: Betty grew up in Kiama before life took her to Blacktown. Her brother Kevin still lives in their old home town. Keeping up with what’s happening down the coast is partly nostalgia for the place she came from, but mostly it’s how she and Kevin fill those long phone calls she looks forward to all week. That’s what this Catch Up is really for. Not just the news, but the conversations it keeps alive.

The Cleverest Bit of Marketing in Australia Right Now

Two founders in work aprons concentrate on detailed work at a cluttered workbench, while a relaxed man in a pale linen suit leans in the open doorway with one hand extended, palm up, doing none of the work but waiting for his share.
Never done a stocktake. Still wants his share.

Betty’s brother Kevin rang from Kiama last week, properly worked up. His daughter’s got a startup, a real one, the kind with late nights and not much sleep, and Kevin had just seen something online about the government coming after people exactly like her. “They’re punishing the ones having a crack,” he told Betty. “Did you see what they’re calling it? An aspiration ambush.” Betty hadn’t seen it. But she could hear that Kevin had already made up his mind, and that whatever he’d watched had done a very good job of helping him.

So she went and had a look. And what she found wasn’t really a tax story at all. It was one of the sharpest bits of marketing you’ll see all year.

We’ve spent two posts on GDP (See here and here).  Your house doesn’t count, and the country keeps shoving its money through the housing door instead of the door where things actually get built. If you missed those, the short version is: money put into a business grows the country, money put into an existing house just makes the house dearer.

Well, this week a bunch of young business owners turned that exact argument into one of the sharpest marketing campaigns you’ll see all year. And whatever you think of the politics, the craft is worth a look, because it’s a masterclass in how to win an argument before anyone’s checked the facts.

Here’s the setup. The budget proposed changing capital gains tax, the tax you pay on the profit when you sell something for more than you bought it. The change makes sense for the housing door, taxing property investors harder so houses stop being such a one-way bet. The founders even say they’re fine with that bit. The trouble is the same change also hits people who sell a business they’ve built. Same swing of the door, and it caught the workshop along with the houses.

Now watch what they did with it.

First, the name. They didn’t call it “proposed CGT discount reform.”

They called it an aspiration ambush. Two words, and you already know whose side you’re meant to be on. “Aspiration” is the good thing, having a crack, building something. “Ambush” is the sneaky thing done to you from behind. Stick them together and you’ve got the whole grievance in a phrase a headline writer can’t resist. That’s not an accident, that’s branding.

Second, the line. The letter says, near enough, we work the hours, we carry the risk. You can’t argue with it. It doesn’t mention tax rates or indexation or any of the stuff that makes your eyes glaze. It just plants a flag: we’re the ones doing the hard yards. Try writing a reply that starts “well, actually” to we work the hours, we carry the risk and see how you sound.

Third, and this is the bit I’d frame and hang on the wall, the silent partner meme. Some of them made fake ads casting the Prime Minister as a 47% shareholder in their business. One posted that he’s a bloke who has never done a stocktake and somehow still gets 47 per cent of the business and takes zero risk. That’s the silent partner gag, and it’s perfect, because it takes an invisible, boring thing, a tax on a sale that might happen years from now, and turns it into a freeloading mate who turns up at payday having done nothing. Everyone’s had a version of that bloke. You feel it before you’ve thought about it. Region Canberra

No wonder Kevin shared it. That’s the gag working exactly as designed, it travels from a screen in Kiama to a phone call with his sister before anyone’s checked a single number.

Fourth, the messenger. They didn’t wheel out grey men from a lobby group. They badged it founders under 40. Young, building things, the future. It’s much harder to paint a 35-year-old who started a company as a greedy fat cat, so the campaign chose faces that don’t fit the villain costume.

Put it together and you’ve got a textbook job: a sticky name, a line you can’t argue with, a meme that does the thinking for you, and the right faces out front. It went everywhere. Sky, the papers, an open letter straight to the PM. That’s what good marketing looks like, it makes its point feel like common sense before the other side has finished clearing its throat.

Now, here’s where Betty keeps her wits about her, because clever marketing is exactly the thing you should be most careful around. Being well-sold isn’t the same as being right.

Albanese’s comeback is, frankly, not bad either, it’s just nowhere near as catchy. He says the campaign is being run by right-wing parties and their allies, and that the meme misses how the tax actually works: it’s only paid when a business is sold, not every year, and most small businesses pay little or no capital gains tax when they sell. If he’s right, the “47% silent partner” doesn’t apply to most of the people sharing it. But “it’s only realised on disposal and most SMEs fall under the threshold” will never, ever beat a funny picture of the PM stealing half your business. The truer claim is losing because the catchier claim is winning. That happens a lot, and it’s worth noticing when it’s happening to you. Western Advocate Region Canberra

So two things are true at the same time. The founders have a real point, the tax change really does seem to clip the productive door as well as the housing one, and that’s the exact problem these posts have been about. And they’ve dressed that point in such good marketing that you should slow down and check it rather than just nod along. Both can be true. Usually are.

That’s the lesson, and it’s a bigger one than capital gains tax. The side with the better slogan isn’t automatically the side that’s right. They’re just the side that hired the better wordsmith. Your job, Betty, is to enjoy the craft, and then go and find out whether the thing it’s selling you is actually true.

Funny old world. We started by working out why your house doesn’t count, and we’ve ended up watching the country’s smartest marketers fight over the door it should’ve been going through all along.

Daily News Round Up – 22 May 2026

Very local, state, national and the wider world, in everyday language, for people who haven’t got all day.

From a fired-up Kiama Council saying no to amalgamation, to jobs slipping and the Iran war keeping petrol dear, here’s the local-to-global wrap for 22 May 2026.

Very Local: what our Council got up to this week

A busy night at the Kiama Council meeting on Tuesday 19 May. Here are the bits that caught my attention.

“No to amalgamation.” The big one. Councillors voted unanimously to reaffirm Kiama as a “strong, proud and independent council” and say a flat no to any merger. The clever part: they’re writing to the sitting member for Kiama and every declared candidate for the 2027 state election, asking each one to put their position on amalgamation in writing so it can be tabled in public. Everyone on the record before the next election. Watch this space.

Money is the cloud over everything. Behind the scenes sat a finance and governance improvement plan, a budget review, and a note about Council’s Performance Improvement Order, which is the state government’s “lift your game” notice hanging over Kiama. That pressure is the real reason the amalgamation fight matters. A small council is scrapping to prove it can stand on its own two feet.

Youth services under a question mark. The Mayor tabled a letter from federal MP Fiona Phillips flagging the possible closure of Council’s SENTRAL Youth Services. The Assistant Minister’s reply says headspace Kiama and others can pick up the slack. Reassuring on paper, but if you’ve got teenagers it’s a sign local youth services may be on the chopping block as budgets tighten.

More homes for Gerringong. Two greenlights worth noting: two residential flat buildings approved at 104 Belinda Street, and 48 Campbell Street set up as an “Urban Release Area,” which is planning-speak for land rezoned for new housing. Housing supply is the thread tying the whole region together right now.

A Jamberoo house off to the lawyers. A dwelling and farm shed on Minnamurra Lane got messy. Councillors split four-all and the item was carried on the chair’s casting vote, deferring it for legal advice first. It’s back in June. A tied vote tells you it’s genuinely contested.

Skate park families, take note. Council backed Option 3 for the Kiama Sports Complex. The promise to find a new and better skate park site got softened to simply relocating it “as per the revised plan.” Keep an eye on where it actually finds a home.

Looking after the locals with fur and roots. In-principle support for the “Save the Greater Glider” campaign and a possible expansion of Seven Mile Beach National Park, plus a long-term plan to tackle the asparagus weed choking the Werri Beach dunes.

The bottom line: it all comes back to money. The improvement order, the budget reviews, the stand against amalgamation, and the worry over youth services are really one story. A small council fighting to stay its own boss while the dollars get tighter. The homes, the gliders, the skate park are all happening on top of that.

Across NSW (State)

Cost of living is still the song that never ends. Sydney’s hung onto its title as the dearest city in the land, and the jobs picture just took a knock too (more on that under Federal). The one bit of breathing room remains rents, which after years of brutal rises have finally levelled off, though nobody’s exactly celebrating at the checkout.

And tonight the city goes a bit magic. Vivid Sydney switches on this evening and runs every night until 13 June, lights glowing from 6pm to 11pm. There’s a 6.5km walk of light displays from Circular Quay through The Rocks, Barangaroo and Darling Harbour, and the drone shows are back, though they’ve shuffled over to Cockle Bay this year. It’s free to wander and look, which is the main thing in a year when everything else costs the earth. Rug up if you go. It’s proper winter now.

Across the Country (Federal)

Jobs took a hit. Today’s big home-front number. The unemployment rate jumped to 4.5% in April, the worst it’s been since late 2021. About 33,000 more people found themselves out of work, and nearly 19,000 jobs actually disappeared over the month. It hit young people hardest (youth unemployment is now over 11%), and this month the losses landed mainly on women, who drove the whole fall in employment while the men’s rate held. This means work is getting harder to find, and that’s the kind of thing that worries a household before it ever worries a politician. Oddly, the share market had one of its best days in weeks on the very same day. A reminder that what’s good for the big end of town and what’s good for your kitchen table aren’t always the same story.

The Budget shake-up, still rumbling on. You’ll remember Treasurer Jim Chalmers handed down his big-swing Budget on 12 May. The headline change for ordinary folk: the government wants to limit negative gearing to new builds from July 2027, and change capital gains tax so it’s tied to inflation with a minimum tax on profits. If you already own an investment property, or had one under contract before 7:30pm on Budget night, you’re left alone. The idea is to give first-home buyers a fairer shot, and they reckon it could help around 75,000 people into a home over a decade. The Opposition’s dead against it.

And here’s where Michael West earns his cuppa. While the big mastheads chase the Budget headlines, the independents are digging where it’s uncomfortable. Two beauties this week from Michael West Media. First, a coal miner versus the Big Australian: BHP, a $300 billion giant, is taking Michael West Media itself to the Federal Court to try and shut down its reporting on an injured coal miner’s wage-theft case. They tried to rush through urgent orders to pull the stories down, and the court told them to wait their turn. The fact they’re being sued and still publishing the file number tells you what kind of outfit they are. Second, Cricket Australia is running an “independent review” into a $600,000 cloud-computing deal at the centre of “contracts-for-mates” allegations, but the whistleblower who raised the alarm has already been made redundant. Exactly the sort of follow-the-money stuff worth your support if you’ve got a spare dollar. Their whole model is “don’t pay so you can read it, pay so everyone can.”

Around the World (International)

The Iran war is still the one that reaches your petrol pump. The US-and-Israel war with Iran has been grinding on since late February, and a shaky ceasefire brokered by Pakistan keeps wobbling on and off. The latest worry is that US intelligence reckons Iran is rebuilding its military faster than expected and has already restarted making drones during the truce. Pakistan’s army chief has flown to Tehran to keep the talks limping along. The fighting keeps squeezing the Strait of Hormuz, a key oil shipping lane, which is exactly why fuel’s been dear the world over, and why so much of our Budget was built around cushioning petrol prices.

Outrage over the Gaza flotilla. This one’s moved fast. Aid activists who’d tried to sail to Gaza were intercepted by Israeli forces, and a video posted by a far-right Israeli minister, taunting them while they knelt bound on the ground, sparked a global firestorm. At least ten countries summoned Israeli ambassadors to explain themselves, Australia and New Zealand among them. As of today, Israel has now deported all the activists, sending them home via Turkey, after even Israel’s own PM called the minister’s behaviour out of line.

A nasty Ebola outbreak in Congo. The head of the World Health Organization has raised the alarm about a rare type of Ebola spreading quickly in the Democratic Republic of Congo. One to keep half an eye on.

The bottom line

It all joins up, Betty. A war on the other side of the planet pushes up oil; oil pushes up the petrol in the car and the price of everything trucked to the shops; and that’s why the Budget was built around fuel relief while the jobs market softens at home. Closer in, our little Council is fighting the same fight in miniature, scrapping to stay independent while the dollars tighten. And through it all, the watchdogs like Michael West keep poking at the powerful so the rest of us can see where the money really goes. Not a bad day’s reading over one cup of tea.

A note on Betty and Kevin: Betty grew up in Kiama before life took her to Blacktown. Her brother Kevin still lives in their old home town. Keeping up with what’s happening down the coast is partly nostalgia for the place she came from, but mostly it’s how she and Kevin fill those long phone calls she looks forward to all week. That’s what this Catch Up is really for. Not just the news, but the conversations it keeps alive.

Sources: Kiama Municipal Council minutes, Sydney Morning Herald, ABS, Michael West Media, Al Jazeera, The Conversation, CNN, CBC, and others.

Net zero, explained the way I’d explain it to Betty from Blacktown.

This is part of my Betty from Blacktown series. Betty isn’t a real person. She’s most of us. She’s spent her life getting good at one thing, and outside that one thing she’s a beginner like everyone else. I was a pharmacist, then I ran an organisation that trained young people to be confident communicators and trusted voices, and when I needed expertise I brought in specialists. So I’m Betty too, on every subject that isn’t mine.

This series is for people who aren’t specialists but want to understand the things that matter to them, including the things they never thought were important until someone a long way above them made a decision that turned up in their lives.
Net zero is one of those. It gets thrown around like everyone already agrees what it means, and most of us don’t. I didn’t either.

The only reason I’ve got enough confidence to write this post is that I’ve had the room in my life lately to think about it, turn it over, lose a bit of sleep on it. Betty hasn’t, because she’s flat out with everything else. That’s the only difference between us. I’m on the same learning curve she is, I just got a head start. And once you’ve worked something out, the decent thing is to share it. So here’s my go.

Think of a bath

Picture a bath with the tap running and the plug half out.

The tap is what we put into the air. The water draining away is what the planet pulls back out, the oceans and the forests soaking it up. Right now the tap is on full and the plug is barely letting anything through, so the level keeps rising and the bath is heading for the floor.

Net zero is the point where the level stops climbing. What’s going in matches what’s draining out.

Notice what that does and doesn’t mean. It doesn’t mean we stop everything. It doesn’t mean we scrub the bath clean and undo the past. It means we stop making it worse. The level stops climbing. That’s a more honest and more reachable thing than people think when they hear the word “zero.”

It’s something we try for

I think of net zero the way I think of saving for a holiday. It’s an aspiration. Something you work towards knowing the date might move, the amount might change, life might get in the way. You don’t abandon the holiday because you might not get there by July.

The trying counts even when we don’t hit the number.

I know this one from the inside. I farmed dairy for years, and I worked with the beef industry too. So when the red meat industry announced in 2017 they’d be carbon neutral by 2030, I shook my head.

Not because the goal was wrong. Because the number wasn’t real. A target only counts for something if it’s within your power to pull off, and that one leaned on thousands of farmers choosing to come along, plus a stack of things nobody controlled. The one real lever they had was whether they could explain to their farmers why it was worth doing, and they reached for the headline instead. By 2025 they admitted they couldn’t make the date and pulled it back.

Dairy did the opposite. We set ourselves something we could actually reach and got on with it. On our own farm we lifted milk production and brought our methane down at the same time, both moving the right way for years. I used to say it in percentages on the radio and watch it slide straight off people. Nobody ever quoted the numbers back to me. But the day I said our family farm puts breakfast on the table for 50,000 Australians every day, people repeated that one back to me for years.

That’s the difference between a number and a picture. And it’s the difference between a target that’s a fantasy and a target that’s real. The fantasy one got abandoned. The realistic goal kept going.

So why isn’t it just happening?

The lazy answer is that people don’t care enough. I don’t buy it.

I bought some ham the other day. It had a fancy new strip on it, tear here, reseal there. I couldn’t open the thing. Ended up using the scissors like always. And I’d have paid extra for that packaging, the clever packaging that doesn’t work, when all I actually wanted was packaging I could recycle. That option wasn’t even on the shelf.

I didn’t fail there. The packaging failed. The easy thing, the recyclable one, was never offered, and then if I give up and bin it the story becomes that I’m the one who didn’t care.

People care plenty. What’s missing is the easy. The right thing is too often the hard thing, the thing with scissors and a surcharge, while the wrong thing is sitting there ready to go. Change that, put the easy option on the shelf, and watch how fast people “start caring.”

What about China? What about everyone else?

This is the one that comes up every time. Why should we bother when China won’t, when the bloke next door won’t, when half the world is heading the other way.

It’s a fair feeling. Nobody wants to be the mug who does the right thing while everyone else free-rides. But notice it’s a feeling about fairness, not about carbon. And the answer isn’t to argue about China. It’s this: you’re not a mug, and you’re not the problem. We built a whole world that rewards looking after number one and treats chipping in for everyone as the sucker’s move. Of course “us” feels like being taken for a ride. That feeling is honest. It’s just aimed at the wrong target.

The same goes for people in poorer countries starting to eat more meat, wanting the things we’ve had for generations. We’re in no position to tell them not to. But we are in a position to share what we’ve worked out, how to produce each kilo with less cost to the planet. Not “go without.” Here’s how. That’s a gift you can offer without being a hypocrite.

A word about how this gets explained

A huge shoutout to Les Robinson, who’s spent a career on how people actually change. His website is worth a coffee and a good long read. The kind of wisdom you find yourself using every day. Les speaks to Betty from Blacktown. He sees her as an equal, a fellow human being trying to do the right thing with the knowledge she has.

Outside your own narrow patch, you’re a non-specialist in nearly everything, same as me. Speaking language everyone can understand is the key. It’s recognising where the room actually is, and treating people as equals. The opposite, hiding good knowledge behind language you know the other person can’t follow, isn’t clever. It’s a wall.

So that’s net zero. A bath that needs to stop rising. A holiday worth saving for even if the date moves. A thing we try for, because the trying changes where we end up, and the alternative is standing back while the bath water goes over the floor.

I’ll be proud of us for trying. Give it a go.

With thanks to four people who’ve built their careers on being understood by Betty from Blacktown: Les Robinson, Dr Jenni Metcalfe, Gaye Steel and Greg Mills. 

☕ Enjoyed Betty’s take? She’s not done yet. Read all of Betty from Blacktown’s catch-ups here 

Your House Doesn’t Count (And Other GDP Surprises)

A whole house, and the scale reads zero. That’s the thing about GDP nobody explains: a home going up in value adds nothing to what the country actually produces.

A couple of weeks ago I drove seven hours to hand out how-to-vote cards, then wrote the whole thing up. Quite a few of you read it. This week my big adventure was reading about capital gains tax for forty minutes on a perfectly good weekday because a Michael West Media piece landed in my inbox and I couldn’t help myself.

Every time the New York Times, Michael West Media or The Conversation turns up, I do a deep dive. A very deep dive. So between the seven days at a polling booth and the forty-minute tax binge, I think we can all agree: I need to get a life.

The good news is I’m going out with friends this weekend. Nice wine, good food, great company. Long overdue.

Before I go and remember what conversation with non-economists feels like, here’s the thing that piece explained that finally made GDP make sense to me after years of nodding along and understanding nothing.

The two kinds of “investing”

There are two ways to put your money to work. They look the same. They are not.

You can buy something that already exists, like an established house, and wait for it to go up in value. You end up richer. Good for you. But nothing new got made. The house was already standing. No extra jobs, no extra goods, nothing extra for the country. Your wealth went up and the nation’s output didn’t move an inch.

Or your money can go into a business. The business buys equipment, trains people, makes products, hires staff. That lifts what the country can actually produce. More gets made for every hour worked. That’s productivity, and productivity is the thing that makes wages rise over the years, for everyone, not just the person who put the money in.

So one is a win for you. The other is a win for you that’s also a win for the whole country.

That was the click for me. I’d always heard “investment” and pictured someone buying a rental. Turns out economists barely count that as investment at all. If it isn’t increasing what the country can produce, it’s really just savings wearing a nicer jacket.

Why it matters for the budget

For 25 years Australia poured its money into the first kind. Existing houses. The tax system practically begged us to, with the 50% capital gains discount and negative gearing making an established property the smartest tax play going.

The result is a $12 trillion housing market, nearly four times the value of every company on the stock exchange combined. A mountain of money sitting in houses that just go up in price, instead of in businesses that build things and employ people.

As one financial writer, Harry Chemay, put it in Michael West Media last week, residential land “may appreciate over time, but it does not by itself generate any economic output.” A house going up in value makes the owner richer without the country producing a single thing extra. michaelwest

That’s what the 2026 budget is trying to shift. Nudge the money out of “buy an old house and wait” and into building new homes and backing businesses. Whether it works is a separate question, and the government has done a woeful job explaining any of it, which I got into elsewhere. But the idea underneath is sound, and it’s the first time I’ve properly understood why anyone bothers measuring productivity at all.

If you want the plain-English version of what the budget actually does to your tax, I wrote that for Betty from Blacktown here. The polling booth piece, if you missed it, is here . And the family farms and capital gains argument is here.

Right. Wine.