How do we support women to feel safe in the workplace

Images and perceptions of a career in law for women certainly took a battering this week.  It had me reflecting on my career choices.  Sometimes the opportunities you DONT take turn out to be very wise.

I received early entry to ANU to do arts/law when I was in year 12. I didnt take up the offer because all my friends where going to Sydney University and I didnt have the confidence to go to Canberra by myself. I instead went to the uni my friends went to and chose pharmacy. It turned out to be a career choice decision I have never regretted. Pharmacy is a career where women are nurtured.  I also realised my lack of confidence to go somehwere alone was important to address and have spent my lifetime gaining confidence to do what’s best for me.

Everyone deserves to feel safe in the workplace.  I look forward to watching how the world of law makes their field a place where women feel safe

If this article reprinted below by Myriam Robin in AFR this week is anything to go by there is a lot of work to be done.

Just smile

 Baker McKenzie tells lady lawyers just ‘smile’

“It’s been a red-letter week for women in the law. But as Australia’s High Court, under the direction of Chief Justice Susan Kiefel, apologised to the former associates of former judge Dyson Heydon for his behaviour, some struck a rather different note.

On its Australian careers Facebook page, global legal behemoth Baker McKenzie shared a quote from an “inspirational” session held as part of its BakerWomen program.

“Your smile is your logo, your personality is your business card, and how you leave others feeling after they have an experience with you becomes your trademark,” it said, referencing a recent seminar on “impact, influence, brand and visibility for women”.

Silly us: we’d have thought even a lady lawyer’s success in court or boardroom the key determinant of their impact and influence.

Telling women to smile more is annoying at the best of times, and positively infuriating when the industry’s spent days discussing its systemic sexism. As is often the barometer for these things, can you imagine male lawyers being given similar advice?”

Ht https://www.afr.com/..

An excellent op-ed in The Saturday Paper by Bri Lee titled Sexual Harrassment in the Legal Profession can be found here

There is clearly a major problem – the solution should be simple

A global survey by the International Bar Association last year estimated that 47 per cent of women lawyers in Australia had been sexually harassed. The president of the Law Council of Australia, Pauline Wright, told The Australian Financial Review, “We know sexual harassment is a leading reason why women step away from the legal profession.”

For the past three decades, women have been graduating from law schools in equal or higher numbers than their male peers, but their numbers thin quickly once they enter the workplace. Research shows the legal profession has higher rates of sexual harassment and bullying than the national average. This problem self-perpetuates and exacerbates. In my time as a judge’s associate, I saw plenty of women, and other good people, leave because of the overwhelming misogyny of the place. Those left behind are more likely to – or be willing to – turn a blind eye to the rot.

Federal government send an extraordinarily strong message to all schools. Agriculture is a huge growth area

I have a huge smile on my face this morning, that smile that tells you everyone else is now understanding why you are so committed to your passion project 

Lynne Strong is smiling

 

Yesterday the government sent an extraordinarily strong message to all schools. Agriculture is a huge growth area

The federal government will fund an extra 39,000 university places by 2023 in a package that will restructure the amounts students have to pay for courses to encourage them to “make more job-relevant choices”.

Under the plan to produce “job-ready graduates”, to be outlined on Friday by Education Minister Dan Tehan, students in agriculture and maths would pay 62% less, while those studying science, health, architecture, environmental science, IT, and engineering would be 20% better off. Source 

The new Archibull Prize program model sees schools investigating an Agricultural Area of Investigation important to them and their community.  Several schools are investigating careers in agriculture, the diversity and the growth areas. I have been working with our intern Jess Fearnley who is synthesising the wealth of data provided to us ( thank you ABS, ABARES and QLD Government) that show careers in agriculture are on a strong growth trajectory particularly in research, big data and technology development.
Two schools are focusing on the importance of having agriculture in the curriculum from K-12 to ensure young people have their eyes open to the exciting opportunities that await them in the agriculture sector.

One of the key strengths of our programs are our Young Farming Champions who show young people who they can be and we have the data to prove it

YFC Careers in Agriculture

We are looking forward to our 2020 schools coming up with their own solutions on how to be promote that agriculture is the place to be

 

 

Meeting fatigue solved

I thrive on the wisdom of the crowd and love being the learner in the room especially when its not just the coach at the front of the room who is sharing their wisdom

I have been working with Zoe Routh from Inner Compass since 2014. Zoe has a weekly newsletter. As a person who stuggles to concentrate when I am part of something that doesn’t seem to have a clear purpose or is happening because its become a habit tha the wisdom in this recent newsletter from Zoe resonated.

Thank you Zoe …….

Meetings anf Gatherings that are just for updates?

Seriously, we have better things to do with our time. Unless we’re making a gathering a purposeful, meaningful, and a neurochemically-laden experience, don’t bother.

How to Create An Event Worth Going To 

If we’ve learned anything through the pandemic, we’ve realised that we need to be more intentional about our gatherings, especially our face to face ones.

For many, the work from home orders have shown us the benefits of these arrangements:

✔️ Less travel

✔️ More comfort

✔️ More convenience

✔️ More productivity (sometimes!)

It’s not true for every situation, but true for many. Enough to consider a blended work arrangement for the future.

It means that getting together in the future, in person, in small or large groups, is going to need to be for a VERY good reason if it’s to get us out of our track pants and slippers.

There are important benefits to face to face gatherings, especially for teams, and they are all biochemical:

Oxytocin: it’s the feel-good neurotransmitter that we get from human touch (a handshake, a hug, a back pat). It also gets released in well-bonded teams, and in moments of connection. These moments are best nurtured in person. We can use all of our subconscious body language sensors to cue intimacy and trust. And when we have physical proximity, our neurochemistry can become synched, especially if those teams have solid systems and structure around interactions to create team safety.

Serotonin: another feel-good neurotransmitter that gets triggered with recognition and elevation of status. When we get recognised by our boss or peers, or when we see others getting recognised, we get a surge of serotonin, and a wonderful feeling of well-being washes over us. Being close to others physically amplifies the sensation.

Dopamine: that’s the little buzz we get from completing a task, getting something done, finding something, recognising a pattern, or solving a problem. When we do this together, the buzz is electric and amplified.

Endorphins: aside from exercise and sex (use your judgment as to the appropriateness of these in the workplace!), we get a load of endorphins when we cry and when we laugh. When this happens collectively, the relief after release creates a sense of connection that is extraordinary.

Cortisol and adrenaline: these are stress hormones designed for quick bursts of energy during times of intense stress or activity. Can trigger survival responses (which is not good for teamwork).

Norepinephrine: similar to cortisol and adrenaline in its effect. It’s the same feeling, whether we see something as threatening or exciting. Pro-tip: reframe an experience as exciting instead of threatening and you will stay in a productive state.

In planning your gatherings then, as CEO, here’s what to consider:

  • Every gathering has a purpose.
  • Every gathering has a meaning.
  • Every gathering has feelings.

We need to cultivate waves of meaning and feelings across each gathering. This is the art of being a neuro-leader!

Here are four types of gathering to master:

Culture Gatherings

These are best for heightened oxytocin and serotonin. Design activities for:

  • Celebration
  • Community
  • Connection

Strategy Gatherings

These are best for norepinephrine and dopamine: building excitement and finding solutions and patterns. Explore:

  • Purpose of the team and business.
  • Potential of the team’s ability and capacity.
  • Possibility for the team and business’s new achievements.

Change Gatherings

These are best for easing the stress hormones of cortisol, adrenaline, and norepinephrine when faced with the unknown. Articulate with others:

  • Gap between now and next.
  • Map across the gap.
  • Message to guide us through.

Productivity Gatherings

These are great for dopamine and norepinephrine: finding solutions, getting tractions and moving forward. Create activities for:

  • Problem solving
  • Planning
  • Marking progress

 

What gatherings are you planning? How can you make them more powerful with intentional amplification of biochemicals?

***

Silhouette of young group of people jumping in ocean at sunset T

 

You can be who you can see

little girl child holds dry reeds and a branch with small white flowers in hands, sunny spring weather, smilling and joy of the child

In my lifetime I have found myself in two life threatening situations. One when I was eight years old and the other in my early forties. In both situations I wish I had made better choices.

The way I have addressed my regrets is to create a national program of initiatives for young people (no matter their age, location, education, socioeconomic status, everything and anything that may prevent a level playing field for equal opportunity ) to support them to have the knowledge, confidence and role models in their lives to make life and career choices they are comfortable with.

This organisation is a charity and it relies on me to source funding. I realised in the last couple of years my biases and baggage were getting in the way of me doing this at the highest level .

I took NO too personally. I saw a NO as some-one telling me, my eight year old self wasnt worthy. I knew for my wellbeing and for the organisation I had to rid myself of this baggage.

What an extraordinary journey it has been. Surrounding myself with beautiful kind people, coaches and mentors and engaging in life long learning

One of the things I have learnt is the importance of compassionate curiosity and the best way to channel it is to think of some-one you know who has it in spades. Today I am sharing a piece written by one of the beautiful people in my life at the moment who does compassionate curiosity better than anyone I have encountered.  This piece was written by Dave  Stachowiak, the founder and host of Coaching for Leaders.

Dave has also kindly agreed to be part of our Young Farming Champions (YFC) Leadership is Language webinar series  and will shortly be interviewed by our YVLT Chair Emma Ayliffe and Vice Chair Dione Howard who are mega fans of his podcast series

This is Dave’s personal reflection this week with the podcast found here  and the text below

Changed My Mind

When I was 16 years old, I discovered that the police department in the town I grew up in had an explorer program. Since I was interested in a career in law enforcement at the time, I attended a meeting and quickly joined.

I was never a sworn police officer – nor have I ever done any of the difficult work in policing. However, I did spend two years volunteering in uniform at community events, riding along many times with police officers on patrol, and even graduated from a junior police academy. I once witnessed a police officer get assaulted right in front of me.

I had an up-front view of how complex the job of police officer is and, although I concluded that law enforcement wasn’t for me, it shaped a lot of my worldview – especially from the perspective of the police.

If you’ve ever listened to the Coaching for Leaders podcast, you know that I often ask experts at the end of interviews what they’ve changed their minds on. It’s a question I also pose to myself.

It’s relevant to speak on the events of the day, because George Floyd’s murder at the hands of the police has direct implications for how many of us in organizations do better.

In the recent years, and reaffirmed in the last month, I’ve changed my mind on at least three things.

First, I used to believe that, unless there was substantial evidence to the contrary, we should generally give police departments the benefit of the doubt, since excessive use of force seemed rare and isolated.

changed-my-mind

On this belief, I was wrong.

Thank goodness for smartphones with cameras. They have opened my eyes to what Black folks have been saying for years about police brutality. After seeing hundreds of these videos in recent years, it’s clear that many of these incidents are deeply rooted in systemic racism, not only in our policing, but in American society as a whole.

Yes, of course police work is dangerous, but so is commercial fishing, agriculture work, and construction. Yes, there are police leaders who have taken significant action to address racism in policing, but many also have not. I’m done giving police departments the benefit of the doubt.

Second, I used to believe that, it’s just a reality for us as a society to accept some “bad apples” in our police forces.

Comedian Chris Rock points out that there are some jobs that are too important to allow for bad behavior. Take pilots for example. No airline allows a margin of error for a certain number of crash landings each year. No nuclear power plant allows its engineers an acceptable number of meltdowns. No hospital allows surgeons a quota for ignoring the needs of certain patients.

I’m left with the uncomfortable conclusion that, particularly on this issue, racism is why I haven’t held police officers to the same standard I would expect of any other professional dealing with life-safety issues. As a result, I’ve changed my mind on allowing a different standard in policing – and in my thinking.

But the most important thing I’ve changed my mind on is my own contribution.

If George Floyd’s murder had happened five years ago and you asked me who killed him, I would have said, “Four police officers.”

I’ve changed my mind on that, too.

Today, I know his blood is also on my hands. While my contribution is different than the people who physically killed him, I and others with privilege contributed to his murder by:

  • Not speaking out against the militarization of America’s police departments.
  • Not recognizing that we need better options for responding to complex situations in our society other than just sending in armed officers.
  • Not pushing any of my elected representatives on this issue.
  • Not having enough empathy for my Black brothers and sisters who have been doing everything imaginable to get attention on this, for years.

I don’t know where this leaves you, but it leaves me with the commitment to do better on what I’m often inviting others to do:

Ask questions instead of assuming, listen for meaning instead of just words, and taking the time to know the stories of others — not just my own.

Dave’s Journal is available by audio on Apple PodcastsGoogle PodcastsOvercastStitcher, and Spotify.