Always Broke, Forever Hopeful, A Brief (and Broke) History of Kiama Council

When ratepayers gave the mayor boxing gloves in 1890, they weren’t kidding. 140 years later, council’s still trying to stop the money leaking out, one glove at a time. 

If you’ve heard whispers that Kiama Council is in financial strife and thought, “Surely this is new?” — allow me to introduce you to the long and time-honoured tradition of municipal money woes. Because, dear reader, we’ve been broke since before board shorts, streetlights, or even bridges were cool.

In 1882, Kiama Council approached Parliament to borrow money for, you guessed it, a tramway. At the time, it was seen as a visionary move. The blue metal trade was booming, basalt was being hauled from the hills to the harbour by horse and dray, and the dust and mud on Kiama’s streets were choking businesses and water tanks. A tramline was proposed to streamline transport from the quarries to the port and keep Kiama competitive in the shipping trade. It might have been brilliant, had it worked.

Instead, it went over budget, underused, and over the edge of financial logic. By 1890, the council was broke. Properly broke. Ratepayers were so fed up they literally handed the mayor a pair of boxing gloves at a council meeting. (Fact, not metaphor.)

By 1894, Kiama Council was saddled with a £4,000 debt to the bank, couldn’t afford basic street repairs, and had to sweep Terralong Street with brooms while dust blew into shops and ruined water tanks. The situation was so dire that they considered lighting the streets with acetylene gas instead of paying their overdue bill to the gas company.

Electricity? That was another slow burn. While towns up and down the coast were already flicking switches, Kiama was still dithering over tenders, tariffs, and the staggering cost of poles and wires. The council’s reluctance to commit funding meant Kiama lagged behind in the electrification stakes, and when lighting finally arrived, it lit up more resentment than roadways.

Water supply? That, too, was a long and thirsty road. For decades, residents relied on rooftop tanks, wells, and carted water. By the late 1800s, a proper water scheme was desperately needed. Eventually, the solution came in the form of Fountaindale Dam,

 located at the confluence of Tangalla Gully and Fountaindale Creek, approximately 10 km west of Kiama. A concrete wall was built to hold back the water, and in 1909 the dam was completed as an on-stream storage facility. It officially became part of Kiama’s water supply system in 1909 at a cost of £7,073 (roughly $1.1 million today). Pipes were laid, tanks were constructed, and water finally flowed. It was a triumph, briefly.

Fast forward to today and the irony is hard to miss. Fountaindale Dam still sits there, perched on what is now my family’s farm. It no longer supplies water to Kiama, having been decommissioned in 1977, yet the dam’s massive wall remains council’s responsibility, a costly, aging relic of early infrastructure dreams that now brings nothing but maintenance bills and engineering headaches. It is not accessible to the public.

Public buildings? Repeatedly proposed, repeatedly defeated, sometimes by referenda with fewer than 20 votes. A grand new civic hall was once declared too ambitious. Central Park was dismissed as a “disgrace to the title,” filled with weeds, quarry rubble, and good intentions.

And the consequences of all this financial floundering?
They were significant.

In 1890, after years of frustration, Gerringong and Jamberoo both seceded, forming their own municipalities and taking with them not only their rates but also a good chunk of local identity and political momentum. The split was celebrated with banquets, and the division remained in place until the mid-1950s.

Even surf culture faced municipal delay. When locals pushed for public bathing and beach access, council’s response was to fine the first man caught swimming in view of the street. It took years, and another round of public outcry, before bathing laws were finally revised and surf clubs allowed to form.

So if you’re feeling nostalgic about balanced budgets and visionary spending, maybe don’t. The truth is, we’ve always operated somewhere between ambition and overdraft.

The real question isn’t, “How did we get into debt?”
It’s more like, “Do we ever learn?”

#KiamaHistory #CouncilChaos #LocalGovernmentWoes #AlwaysBroke #MunicipalMeltdown #FountaindaleDam #BoxingGlovesAndBudgets #KiamaCouncil #TramwayTroubles #BudgetBlunders #HistoricalIrony #BlueMetalAndRedInk

Author: Lynne Strong

I am a community advocate, storyteller and lifelong collaborator with a deep commitment to strengthening local democracy and amplifying regional voices. With roots in farming and decades of experience leading national initiatives like Action4Agriculture, I’ve dedicated my life to empowering the next generation and creating platforms where people feel seen, heard and valued. I believe in courage, kindness and the power of communities working together to shape their own future. These days, you’ll find me diving deep into the role of local media and civic engagement to explore how regional communities around the world are reclaiming their voice.

2 thoughts on “Always Broke, Forever Hopeful, A Brief (and Broke) History of Kiama Council”

  1. I worked in local government for 25 years at Shellharbour Council. We watched in amazement of how close Kiama Council sailed close to the wind with it’s poor financial state. I was the person who blew the whistle about 4 years ago when the information contained in the Annual Financial Reports didn’t make sense. Like you Lynne, i was treated like the enemy and rather than use my expertise was subjected to poor behaviour and bullying tactics. In the end i just gave up.

    1. Your experience with KMC really highlights a deeper problem, the kind of leadership that values control over competence. When people in charge see themselves as the smartest in the room, they stop listening. That’s not leadership, it’s insecurity with authority.
      It’s textbook poor governance. Good leadership draws on collective expertise, encourages challenge, and makes space for dissent. What you and I experienced is the opposite, systems run by people who confuse critique with threat, and surround themselves with yes-people.
      That kind of culture isn’t just dysfunctional, it’s dangerous. It hides risk, erodes public trust, and drives out exactly the people we need.
      Thanks again for speaking up.

Comments are closed.

Discover more from Clover Hill Diaries - Join Me and Be the Change

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading